comradewodka replied to your post “comradewodka replied to your post:
okay it’s a…”
and incidentally, what do you think about ‘mystery’ stories that do give you most if not all of the clues you need to piece it together yourself, but also may rely on later twists/reveals to make sure you’re ‘pleasantly misled’ or don’t get it all right all at once? sort of a la phoenix wright and so on
I MISSED THIS sorry
Well personally, I don’t give a shit if I figure out the story in advance. I’ve read a lot, I’ve written a lot, and I’m very, very, hard to surprise. Sitting here, I can’t remember the last time that I was actually caught off guard (though I remember at least one time where I predicted the last 30min of a movie so accurately that my stepdad just turned off the tv in disgust).
If a twist is really done well it’ll usually make me scream, delightedly. But this means that the actual clues to the twist were there, I just missed them.
Authors who put in twists just to have them (especially if they’re not actually supported by the story) really irritate me. I had a friend like that who really idolized King and wanted to put twists in all his stories. I tried to break him of the habit only because he was more focused on the twist than on a believable narrative to get there, which I think is ALSO a problem with a lot of authors who write those kinds of stories.
They’re more interested in one-upping their readers than anything else, which doesn’t sit right with me.
So, basically, it depends on the skill of the writer!